Autosave: 2024-03-20 07:20:03
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8b9a01667
commit
6eaf444bc5
1 changed files with 29 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -34,10 +34,38 @@ To derive the complement of an unsigned number:
|
|||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
To derive the unsigned equivalent of a signed number
|
||||
To derive the unsigned equivalent of a signed number you invert the process but
|
||||
still make the smallest digit `1`:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
### Formal expression
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
2^n - x
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
- where $x$ is the negative integer in binary that we wish to derive
|
||||
- where $n$ is the word length of the binary system in bits.
|
||||
|
||||
Applied to the earlier example we have $2^4 -5$ which is:
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
16 - 5 = 11
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
When we convert the decimal `11` to binary we get `1011` which is identical to
|
||||
the signed version of the unsigned integer.
|
||||
|
||||
We can confirm the correctness of the derviation by summing the signed and
|
||||
unsigned binary values. If this results in zeros (ignoring the overflow bit),
|
||||
the derivation is correct as the two values effectively cancel each other out:
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
1011 + 0101 = 0000
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
## Applications
|
||||
|
||||
## Related notes
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue