2024-12-20 13:12:10 +00:00
|
|
|
---
|
2024-12-27 14:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
tags: [encryption, cryptography]
|
2024-12-20 13:12:10 +00:00
|
|
|
created: Friday, December 20, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# bbdcb54f_public_key_cryptography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_A_ wants to send a message to _B_. A wants to ensure that only _B_ can read the
|
|
|
|
|
message and that it is not intercepted or altered during transmission to _B_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Think of _B_ as being in possession of a letterbox. The letterbox contains
|
|
|
|
|
messages that only he can read. Anyone can put letters in it for _B_ to read but
|
|
|
|
|
_B_ alone can read them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is achieved by encyrpting the messages with two keys: a public key and a
|
|
|
|
|
private key. The public key can be shared with others and anyone in possession
|
|
|
|
|
of the public key can encrypt a message for _B_. Once encrypted, only _B_ can
|
|
|
|
|
decrypt it using his private key. Once receiving the message, B uses his private
|
|
|
|
|
secret key - that he doesn't share with anyone else - to decrypt. This is the
|
|
|
|
|
equivalent to opening up the letterbox and taking out the letters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another useful analogy is to think of invisible ink. Anyone can write a letter
|
|
|
|
|
using the invisible ink but only the recipient has the liquid that can render it
|
|
|
|
|
visible again. Anyone intercepting the message (without the liquid) will see
|
|
|
|
|
nothing, equivalent to the encrypted data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is asymmetric encryption because the two communicating parties do not have
|
|
|
|
|
equal access to the messages exchanged. _A_ can only send messages - he can't
|
|
|
|
|
decrypt them, only _B_ can. So _A_ is unequal relative to _B_. With symmetric
|
|
|
|
|
encryption _A_ and _B_ would both share a single private key which they would
|
|
|
|
|
each use to encrypt and decrypt their messages.
|
